<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explorations in the World of Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://my.galagzee.com/2009/09/05/explorations-in-the-world-of-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://my.galagzee.com/2009/09/05/explorations-in-the-world-of-linux/</link>
	<description>Tech in a Galagzee, Not So Far Away.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess Portnoy</title>
		<link>http://my.galagzee.com/2009/09/05/explorations-in-the-world-of-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-11546</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Portnoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.galagzee.com/?p=375#comment-11546</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I can spend hours comparing the FreeBSD ports mechanism to the APT/DEB and YUM/RPM combos and, how can one neglect to mention Gentoo and portage and Emerge? :)
Packaging and configuration management is an interesting topic and it is fascinating to review and analyze the various takes OSs have on that.
In the comparison respect, I enjoy referring to this document:
http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/freebsdports.html
It is very educational in general but also makes some interesting comparisons.

I too, like the .*BSDs, though I am a Linux person by nature and preference. I would not call Linux chaotic but rather, flexible. But that&#039;s an argument as old as time :)

The .*BSDs take the much more classical UNIX approach of perfectly matching the user space [LIBC, utils, etc] to the kernel one, an approach Linux does not really share so religiously. There are, I feel, advantages to each approach in general and kernel in specific.. 

Since you mentioned YUM I&#039;d like to recommend yum-merge-conf: Yum plugin to merge configuration changes when installing packages.
I find it very useful myself.

Also, in my opinion, Debian&#039;s APT/dpkg is better than YUM/RPM, perhaps you will also like it better, worth a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I can spend hours comparing the FreeBSD ports mechanism to the APT/DEB and YUM/RPM combos and, how can one neglect to mention Gentoo and portage and Emerge? <img src='http://my.galagzee.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Packaging and configuration management is an interesting topic and it is fascinating to review and analyze the various takes OSs have on that.<br />
In the comparison respect, I enjoy referring to this document:<br />
<a href="http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/freebsdports.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~talon/freebsdports.html</a><br />
It is very educational in general but also makes some interesting comparisons.</p>
<p>I too, like the .*BSDs, though I am a Linux person by nature and preference. I would not call Linux chaotic but rather, flexible. But that&#8217;s an argument as old as time <img src='http://my.galagzee.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The .*BSDs take the much more classical UNIX approach of perfectly matching the user space [LIBC, utils, etc] to the kernel one, an approach Linux does not really share so religiously. There are, I feel, advantages to each approach in general and kernel in specific.. </p>
<p>Since you mentioned YUM I&#8217;d like to recommend yum-merge-conf: Yum plugin to merge configuration changes when installing packages.<br />
I find it very useful myself.</p>
<p>Also, in my opinion, Debian&#8217;s APT/dpkg is better than YUM/RPM, perhaps you will also like it better, worth a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
