<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T (sbcglobal.net) misses a beat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://my.galagzee.com/2007/10/27/att-sbcglobalnet-misses-a-beat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://my.galagzee.com/2007/10/27/att-sbcglobalnet-misses-a-beat/</link>
	<description>Tech in a Galagzee, Not So Far Away.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ville Walveranta</title>
		<link>http://my.galagzee.com/2007/10/27/att-sbcglobalnet-misses-a-beat/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ville Walveranta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 03:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.galagzee.com/index.php/2007/10/27/att-sbcglobalnet-misses-a-beat/#comment-335</guid>
		<description>I just did a &quot;Round the World Major ISP Lookup&quot; for sbcglobal.net, and in fact all major ISPs seem to have dropped the zone from their DNS caches by now. And still no major complaints can be seen on the web (or perhaps I&#039;m just not looking in the right places?) It would seem that in no time they will be completely unreachable. Has sbcglobal.net domain been discontinued after AT&amp;T transfer?? Many people (even several who I know) seem to be still using a sbcglobal.net address for their email. Odd.

---

David, I&#039;ve been very happy with OpenDNS service... keep up the good work!! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did a &#8220;Round the World Major ISP Lookup&#8221; for sbcglobal.net, and in fact all major ISPs seem to have dropped the zone from their DNS caches by now. And still no major complaints can be seen on the web (or perhaps I&#8217;m just not looking in the right places?) It would seem that in no time they will be completely unreachable. Has sbcglobal.net domain been discontinued after AT&#038;T transfer?? Many people (even several who I know) seem to be still using a sbcglobal.net address for their email. Odd.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>David, I&#8217;ve been very happy with OpenDNS service&#8230; keep up the good work!! <img src='http://my.galagzee.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Ulevitch</title>
		<link>http://my.galagzee.com/2007/10/27/att-sbcglobalnet-misses-a-beat/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ulevitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://my.galagzee.com/index.php/2007/10/27/att-sbcglobalnet-misses-a-beat/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Actually, we&#039;re just the only DNS provider that thinks it&#039;s important to run a reliable service and drive forward innovation in the handling of DNS on the Internet.

We never hold records longer than we are supposed to, that said, we will hold them as long as you tell us to (with the TTL).

We also do other fun tricks. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, we&#8217;re just the only DNS provider that thinks it&#8217;s important to run a reliable service and drive forward innovation in the handling of DNS on the Internet.</p>
<p>We never hold records longer than we are supposed to, that said, we will hold them as long as you tell us to (with the TTL).</p>
<p>We also do other fun tricks. <img src='http://my.galagzee.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
